Intersol CEO Invited to Speak at Annual IOSH Food and Drink Industry Conference
With renewed focus on food crimes and health and safety of the industry, Intersol CEO has been invited to address the annual conference of the industry on the topic: ‘Managing Difficult Conversations in the Food and Drink Industry’.
The theme of the conference is ‘Food for Thought’ and details are as follows:
What you must do if you suspect illegal activity in your business
Aziz Rahman, of award-winning business crime solicitors Rahman Ravelli, outlines the importance of the correct approach to investigating suspicions of business crime.
If a business suspects that a crime is being carried out against it – or even on its behalf, in cases of, for example, bribery and corruption – those suspicions must be investigated thoroughly.
If investigations indicate that crime has occurred, a business has three options:
Report the matter to the police.
Start civil proceedings against the person believed to have committed the offence, in order to recoup any losses.
Bring a private prosecution, under the Prosecution Offences Act 1985, against that person.
A private prosecution gives you more control over proceedings than a police investigation, can often cost less than civil proceedings and can deter other would-be offenders.
Civil proceedings, however, can be brought while also reporting the matter to the police or bringing a private prosecution.
Before any option is chosen, the suspicions must be assessed by someone experienced in conducting thorough, informed internal investigations. This requires legal expertise and an ability to unearth evidence to get to the truth.
Whether it be theft, fraud, bribery, false accounting, money laundering or any other white-collar crime that is uncovered upon investigation, you need to know the course of action that will secure the best outcome for you and your business.
This requires a knowledge of business crime law; which is challenging, as it has been subject to much change recently. For example, the past year alone has seen two landmark court decisions affecting what internal investigation documents must be handed over to the authorities if a criminal investigation begins.
At Intersol we support the private sector by designing workplace investigation strategies and have been so employed in global banking, corporate risk management, regulatory, and GRC. Insufficient importance attached to accurate and detailed workplace meetings that will inform decision making. Increasingly clients have said, “You know what, please will you partner with us and guide us through the process”, indeed on occasion “Will you do it for us”. The latter option really does give transparency and independence! Based in the NW but operating globally, we’re really keen to develop and support local businesses more. If we can help, take a look at us at http://www.intersolglobal.com
Intersol delighted to appoint Philip Adlem as Commercial Director.
With 35 years cutting edge experience of sales and commercial management in the private sector, Phil is a fantastic addition to the senior management team at Intersol and a key appointment as the board implement their strategic plan.
For more information about Phil and the Intersol team see here: https://www.intersolglobal.com/about/
As the 2017 International Investigative Interviewing Group (iiirg) conference gets underway in Monterey, California, Intersol are delighted to launch their U-tube channel with a debut video of their Chairman, Professor Eric Shepherd, explaining their concept of Extraordinary Case Management (ECM®) and how it is the ‘difference that makes the difference’. The channel will be populated with snippets of helpful tips for anyone with involvement in ‘fact-finding’ processes (investigations!) who values detail and accuracy.
Why We Lie: The Science Behind Our Deceptive Ways.
Waiting in the lounge for a flight to California to attend and exhibit at the annual International Investigative Interviewing Research Group (IIIRg) the author happened across this excellent article from National Geographic within a Twitter post by an eminent forensic psychology research expert, Professor Lorraine Hope. It perfectly sums up so many elements of the importance and vital part lying plays in all our lives. WE ALL LIE!
What’s crucial to investigation and professional workplace fact-finding interviewing is to distil the truth from lies, fact from fiction, and expose those lies that are relevant to, and impact on, the findings and outcomes. It is the internal and external scientific validation of an account an interview offers that is crucial, not whether 80 year old technology indicates someone might be under stress and lying about ‘something’.
Interestingly the most telling note was that the imagery of the polygraph was taken from an American museum – long should it remain there!
The article is excellent and well worth a read. If anyone reading this is at the conference please take a moment to contact and meet us at the Intersol stand. We’re passionate about the discipline and have decades of practitioner experience and learning to share.
Link to full article here: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/lying-hoax-false-fibs-science/
Conflict Mediation – just one outcome of Extraordinary Case Management (ECM®)
ECM® drives out many outcomes and solutions from a workplace ‘problem’. Mediation is just one option and is proving to be an increasingly popular and effective outcome from any case that has been managed ‘extraordinarily’. At Intersol we proudly engage with the very best to present a holistic solution and support for our clients. It’s what sets us apart from others in the market place.
Mediation is an effective way of resolving disputes. It is a forward-focused process aimed at finding common ground and positive outcomes. It provides an opportunity for the participants to be heard and empowers individuals to resolve their own conflict, without the involvement of the courts. The ‘win-lose’ outcome of litigation can be avoided in mediation process, with settlements that are mutually satisfactory to all participants, saving time, energy and money. The process is consensual and the participants decide whether an agreement can be reached and its terms. Any information shared by one participant, cannot be disclosed by the mediator to the other participant unless they have express permission. Any participant may withdraw from the mediation at any stage.
When and Where to Mediate?
The process of mediation is flexible and focuses on the needs and interests of the individuals who can mediate as soon as they are ready to talk about a resolution of their dispute. What takes place during a mediation is confidential and cannot be used outside the process in any subsequent legal proceedings. Mediation can take place with, without or before the involvement of lawyers and before the issuance of any legal proceedings, or as directed by a court.There are no set rules as to where a mediation can take place. Usually, the process is held at a location agreed by the participants. Conference rooms at the Chambers of 9 Bedford Row are available to host mediations by arrangement.
What to Mediate?
Mediation can be used to resolve a wide range of disputes. These include community and neighbourhood issues, insurance matters, contractual claims, building or boundary disputes, landlord and tenant disagreements, professional negligence matters, to name just a few. The mediation process can be shaped to meet the needs of the participants and the particular details of the dispute. In short, flexibility is mediation’s greatest strength. Further, any information shared by one participant, cannot be disclosed by the mediator to the other participant unless they have express permission to do so. Any participant may withdraw from the mediation at any stage.
Gillian Higgins, a senior Intersol consultant, is an accredited civil and commercial mediator to international standard. She is also a workplace and employment mediator. With 17 years experience of internal and international conflicts from an international criminal law perspective, Gillian is also expertly placed to advise on and mediate in complex, politically-sensitive conflicts. She also lectures on civil and commercial mediation as a member of the faculty of the London School of Mediation.
The link to her Mediation service can be found here: http://www.mediationofconflict.com/ and feel free to contact us at email@example.com if you’d like an informal confidential discussion about the services we offer – it’s free!
Breaking News! – Intersol Formalise their Strategic Partnership with iKAT Consulting
The Board of Intersol are delighted to announce that they have agreed a formal strategic alliance with iKAT Consulting, world leaders in Knowledge, AdviceandTraining in the areas of Interviewing, Investigations and Intelligence to public and private sectors clients worldwide. Intersol have worked collegiately and successfully with iKAT and their directors, Andy and Jacqui Griffiths, on many occasions so this is simply a small step in formalising the relationship between the 2 entities.
Many readers will already know that Dr Andy Griffiths co-authored the definitive work on Investigative Interviewing with our Chairman, Professor Eric Shepherd, retiring from the police in 2014 having been the head of Sussex Major Crime Investigation Unit and Intelligence, and a national operational champion of investigative interviewing.
Andy enjoys an international reputation and is a sought after authority on the topic of ethical interviewing globally, and we look forward to a long and positive collaborative relationship that will add significant excellence and quality to the delivery of Extraordinary Case Management (ECM®)
If you are seeking support to manage challenging conversations and workplace meetings, to protect your brand and reputation, add value, reduce cost and manage risk, speak to us at Intersol. We are world leaders in what we do, subject matter experts who are innovative, current, relevant, and still practice to maintain competence. We work with you contextually and proportionately to deliver what you need, not what we think you need!
For a free, confidential, and discreet initial consultation please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor Amina Memon, from Royal Holloway, University of London, wins prestigious Outstanding Impact in Society in the ESRC Celebrating Impact Prize 2017.
We are delighted that Professor Memon has won this award. As one of a distinguished few who have worked tirelessly for over a quarter of a century to develop and improve cognitive interviewing of some of the most vulnerable she is owed a debt of gratitude for the quality and value she has helped contribute to UK criminal justice. Without the research of her and other like-minded psychologists the world of investigative interviewing would be a poorer place and justice for many would have been miscarried.
“Based on what we know about how memory works, it’s possible to conduct interviews that focus on the strengths of a witness and help them to open up and give a detailed, accurate account, while minimising the risks of gathering unreliable information that can lead to miscarriages of justice,” she explains.
At Intersol we are proud and honoured to continue the work we did with Amina in Law Enforcement and extend its benefit and application to the private and commercial world. It is the science behind the mind that is common to all fact-finding interviews and workplace meetings.
If your business involves managing challenging conversations and workplace meetings, as world leaders we can work with you to protect your brand and reputation, adding value, reducing cost and managing risk by supporting and enabling detailed and accurate fact-finding interviews as the DNA of Extraordinary Case Management (ECM®)
The link to Professor Memons award detail can be found here: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/news-events-and-publications/impact-case-studies/protecting-vulnerable-witnesses/
The tragedy of recent events is all too painful, but so much more could have been done to assuage grief and help people ‘have purpose’ aside from adding real value and quality to the investigation(s). It’s too late again for the victims of Westminster, Manchester Arena, Borough Market, and Grenfell Tower (how quick does todays news become ‘chip-paper’), but it’s not too late for the inevitable victims and witnesses of the next dreadful attack on civility.
Intersols senior partners were privileged to develop, field-test, pilot, and roll-out an investigative interview tool that represented one of the most impactive practical tools to enhance and preserve the fragile memories of witnesses to incidents. Researched and designed by the worlds leading experts on memory and cognition we were able to add practical application and prove its value at the highest level of judicial examination in the UK courts.
The added value not initially appreciated by the developers was the strategic and tactical identification and prioritisation of key witnesses, and, interestingly, evaluation feedback that revealed a significant hidden cathartic benefit for the witness. The ‘witnesses’ frequently reported a feeling of relief and usefulness – that they had in some way contributed at a time of immense stress.
This in addition to cementing the witness testimony, supporting them when under scrutiny at court, preventing confabulation by social media and 24 hour news demands; saving time, reducing cost and adding value not just to the investigation but to brand and reputation.
Once the core component of the response kit to a major incident it’s value would have been incalculable to the series of tragic incidents that have stretched police resources to (and beyond in truth) breaking point.
If you’re reading this post and have any influence with decision makers, maybe bring it to their attention? Repeated overtures to Government and Law Enforcement have yet to yield any response.
Corporate Manslaughter, Shutting the Door After the Horse has Bolted – Why does it take a loss of life to trigger action?
From, and acknowledgements to, Ionas Glinavos and The Conversation:
The disaster at Grenfell Tower has been described by David Lammy, Labour MP for Tottenham, as a case of “corporate manslaughter”.
According to English law, companies and organisations can be found guilty of corporate manslaughter as a result of serious management failures, resulting in a gross breach of a duty of care.
Amid calls for arrests, it’s time to consider whether the failings that led to the Grenfell disaster could possibly justify the use of the label “corporate manslaughter” – and what this would mean for victims who seek justice.
Prosecutions for this offence are of a corporate body (defined broadly enough to include public authorities) and not individuals – so we probably won’t see any pictures of executives being led away in handcuffs. That said, directors, board members and others may still be liable to prosecution under health and safety law or general criminal law. The offence also covers contractors and sub-contractors, so long as they owe a duty of care to the victims.
A duty of care is an obligation, whereby an organisation must take reasonable steps to protect a person’s safety. Legally, it is broadly understood as avoiding negligence by not placing people in danger. These duties also exist in relation to workplaces and equipment, as well as to products or services supplied to customers. This suggests that when an entity exercises control over people and spaces it has a responsibility to protect them.
The corporate manslaughter offence uses the same definitions of duty of care as the common law offence of gross negligence manslaughter. This means that the threshold for the offence is high – the way that activities were managed or organised must have fallen seriously far below reasonable standards.
Any organisation convicted of this offence would face a fine of anywhere between £180,000 and £20m (though there is no hard maximum limit). They would also be handed a publicity order, which requires them to publicise the conviction, along with certain details of the offence, as specified by the court. The court can also set a remedial order, requiring the organisation to address the cause of the fatal injury, which in this case could have consequences for similar tower blocks.
While there is no direct precedent for this kind of tragedy – involving massive loss of life for non-workers – to help us estimate penalties, some indications can be gleaned from the fines imposed on rail operators for train accidents. In 2003, Thames Trains and Network Rail were fined over £2m and £4m respectively, in relation to the health and safety breaches that led to the 1999 Ladbroke Grove train crash, which killed 31 people. And in 2006, Network Rail was fined £3.5m and Balfour Beatty an eventual £7.5m (following an appeal) for faults leading to the fatal derailment of a train near Hatfield in 2000.
At IG we have been described as the ‘ambulance at the bottom of the cliff’, trying to undertake remedial work after disaster has struck, where in reality we are doing all we can to position ourselves not just at the cliff edge, nor as an ambulance, but sufficiently far back from the edge to stop you falling off it in the first place!
As the advisors on one of the first prosecutions for Corporate Manslaughter (and several others since), we now seek to reverse engineer the failings they exposed to support organisations to save lives, manage risk better, preserve reputation and brand, and reduce costs by encouraging ‘Extraordinary Case Management’ (ECM®). We encourage and practice Case Management that is ‘Extraordinary’ and positions the fact finding meetings as the DNA throughout the entire ECM process.
If you want to understand and know more how we can help you and your organisation be extraordinary please contact us at email@example.com